So, Clint's post about the IE issues with the site JavaScript prompted a question for me that's been sitting in the back of my mind for quite a while. I've been using the .prototype method for the ...

JavaScript classes provide a much simpler and clearer syntax to create objects and deal with inheritance." A StrongLoop blog post echoes the "syntactic sugar" angle. "ECMAScript 2015, formerly known ...

anyone have any experience with client-side browser based JavaScript classes?i'm looking to write a wrapper to deal with the usual problem: browser compatibillity. the problem i'm running into is ...

class Song { static label = "Exile"; } The field is then only accessible via the class name, Song.label. Unlike Java, the JavaScript instances do not hold a reference to the shared static variable.